Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Guidelines
ISSUING ORGANISATIONS:
Clinical Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization have been issued by:
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Recommendations have been classified in both guidelines according to the level of evidence supporting the usefulness and efficacy of the procedure:
Clinical Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization have been issued by:
- ACC American College of Cardiology / AHA American Heart Association
- ESC European Society of Cardiology / EACTS European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- STS Society of Thoracic Surgeons
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Recommendations have been classified in both guidelines according to the level of evidence supporting the usefulness and efficacy of the procedure:
- Class I
- Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective
- Class II
- Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness or efficacy of a procedure or treatment
- Class Ila - Weight of evidence or opinion is in favour of usefulness or efficacy
- Class llb - Usefulness or efficacy is less well established by evidence or opinion
- Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness or efficacy of a procedure or treatment
- Class Ill
- Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful or effective, and in some cases may be harmful
TREATMENT STRATEGY SELECTION
- Class I: ( ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS) for the use of a Heart Team approach in determining treatment strategy and selection of appropriate revascularization procedure PCI or CABG.
- The ACC/AHA guidelines define a Heart Team as
- A multidisciplinary team of an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon who jointly:
- Review the patient's medical condition and coronary anatomy
- Determine that PCI and/or CABG are technically feasible and reasonable
- Discusses revascularization options with the patient before a treatment strategy is selected.
- A multidisciplinary team of an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon who jointly:
Indications and Contraindications
ACC/AHA Guidelines 2011:
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) scores are recommended by both guidelines for risk stratification to aid in clinical decision-making.
- Define significant stenosis as
- 70% diameter narrowing
- 50% for Left Main Stem )LMS)
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) <0.80 may also be considered significant.
- Some recommendations use SYNTAX scores as surrogates for the extent and complexity of CAD
- Goals of the Procedure:
- To improve symptoms and/or improve survival
- Improved survival, is generally given greater weight when selecting a procedure.
- In discussions of options, the patient should clearly understand the goal of the procedure (symptom relief, improved survival, or both) before a decision is made
- Revised its recommendation to include the development and use of standardised, evidence-based, and interdisciplinary protocols for low-risk and common scenarios
- However, in such cases, revascularization at the time of diagnostic angiography is recommended against in order to allow for full assessment of the optimal treatment strategy.
- Multidisciplinary systematic evaluation is still required for complex cases
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) scores are recommended by both guidelines for risk stratification to aid in clinical decision-making.
INDICATIONS FOR CABG TO IMPROVE SYMPTOM
ACC/AHA and ESC/EACT GUIDELINES
ACC/AHA and ESC/EACT GUIDELINES
INDICATION |
ACC/AHA |
ESC/EACT |
Significant stenosis and unacceptable angina despite medical therapy |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
Significant stenosis and unacceptable angina in patients with medication contraindications or adverse effects, or patient preference |
CLASS IIa |
|
In a good candidate, CABG may be considered over PCI for complex three-vessel CAD (eg, STYNTAX score >22) with or without involvement of the proximal LAD artery |
CLASS IIa |
CLASS I |
Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TLR) as an adjunct to CABG may be considered in patients with viable ischemic myocardium that is perfused by coronary arteries that are not amenable to grafting |
CLASS IIb |
INDICATIONS FOR CABG TO IMPROVE SURVIVAL
ACC/AHA and ESC/EACT GUIDELINES
ACC/AHA and ESC/EACT GUIDELINES
INDICATION |
ACC/AHA |
ESC/EACT |
LMS ( LEFT MAIN STEM) DISEASE |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
3VD WITH OR WITHOUT PROXIMAL LAD DISEASE |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
2VD WITH PROXIMAL LAD DISEASE |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
2VD WITHOUT PROXIMAL LAD DISEASE |
CLASS IIa (with extensive ischaemia) |
CLASS IIb |
1VD WITH PROXIMAL LAD DISEASE |
CLASS IIa (with LIMA for longterm benefit) |
CLASS I |
1VD WITHOUT PROXIMAL LAD DISEASE |
CLASS III |
CLASS IIb |
LV DYSFUNCTION |
CLASS IIa (EF 35-50%) CLASS IIb EF < 25%) |
CLASS I (EF <40%) |
SURVIVORS OF SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH WITH PRESUMED ISCHAEMIA MEDIATED VT |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
3VD: THREE VESSEL DISEASE 2VD: TWO VESSEL DISEASE 1VD: SINGLE VESSEL DISEASE EF: EJECTION FRACTION VT: VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA LV: LEFT VENTRICULAR |
EMERGENCY CABG
- Both ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS provide guidance on emergency CABG.
- ACC/AHA guidelines provide a CLASS I recommendation for emergency CABG in:
- STEMI where
- PCI has been impossible to perform or has failed
- And the patient has persistent pain and ischaemia threatening a significant area of myocardium despite medical therapy.
- STEMI where
- Other CLASS I indications for emergency CABG in the setting of STEMI include:
- Ventricular septal defect POST Ml
- Papillary muscle rupture
- Free wall rupture
- Ventricular pseudo-aneurysm
- Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias
- Cardiogenic shock.
Emergency CABG is NOT RECOMMENDED in the following cases:
- Persistent angina but only a small area of ischaemia AND haemodynamically stable
- No-reflow state (successful epicardial reperfusion with unsuccessful microvascular reperfusion)
- Ventricular tachycardia (VT) with scar and no evidence of ischaemia
CABG after failed PCI
Class I:
- Ongoing ischaemia or threatened occlusion with myocardium at risk
- Haemodynamic compromise:
- without impairment of coagulation and
- without a previous sternotomy
- Haemodynamic compromise:
- with impairment of coagulation and
- without a previous sternotomy
- Retrieval of a foreign body (fractured guidewire or stent) in a crucial location
- Hemodynamic compromise and previous sternotomy; emergency CABG may be considered
Comorbidities/Higher-Risk Cohorts
Diabetes Mellitus
The ACC/AHA recommends CABG over PCI for improved survival in patients with comorbid DM and multivessel CAD, particularly with use of LIMA GRAFT (CLASS I)
ACC)/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAl/STS 2014 Guidelines update provid the following recommendations for patients with stable IHD and DM:
The ESC/EACTS guidelines recommend:
- The recommendation was upgraded from class Ila in the 2011 guidelines to class I in the 2014 guidelines.
- However, the use of BIMA is associated with increased risk of infection and should be considered only when the benefit outweighs the increased risk (class llb).
ACC)/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAl/STS 2014 Guidelines update provid the following recommendations for patients with stable IHD and DM:
- Patients should receive medical therapy
- Revascularization should be considered for patients with symptoms that remain inadequately controlled despite medical therapy
- A Heart Team approach is beneficial in the evaluation of CABG versus PCI
- Mortality risk appears to be lower with CABG than with PCI in most patients with DM and complex multivessel disease, but exceptions may be identified.
The ESC/EACTS guidelines recommend:
- CABG as the revascularization modality of choice for improved survival in patients with DM and multivessel or complex (SYNTAX Score >22) CAD.
- However, PCI can be considered as a treatment alternative in diabetic patients with multivessel disease and a low SYNTAX score <22.
Kidney Disease
ACC/AHA consider CABG as reasonable (CLASS llb) recommendations) In the setting of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the for the following indications:
- To improve survival for patients with LMS stenosis >50%
- To improve survival and relieve symptoms resistant to medical therapy in patients with >70% stenosis in:
- Three major vessels or
- The proximal LAD artery plus one other major vessel
- CABG should not be performed in patients with ESRD whose life expectancy is limited because of non-cardiac conditions.
- Prefer CABG over PCI for patients with multivessel CAD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) when surgical risk is acceptable and life expectancy is longer than 1 year
- PCI is preferred for those patients with high surgical risk and/or life expectancy < 1 year but may be challenging in those with heavily calcified coronaries.
- Considerations include delaying CABG until the effects of angiography on renal function have subsided.
Valvular Disease
ACC/AHA recommendations:
- CLASS I: AVR for moderate - severe aortic stenosis undergoing CABG
- Ischemic mitral valve regurgitation (MR) that is not likely to be resolved with revascularization should have concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement with CABG
- CLASS I For severe MR
- CLASS Ila for moderate MR
- CLASS llb for mild MR
- CLASS I: in concurrent valvular surgery, intraoperative TOE ( transoesophageal echocardiography) should be performed
- Perform CABG in patients with stenosis > 70% in a major vessel and an aortic/mitral valve surgery indication (CLASS I)
- Consider CABG in patients with stenosis 50-70% in a major vessel and an aortic/mitral valve surgery indication (CLASS Ila)
- Perform mitral valve surgery in severe MR and LVEF >30% with CABG (CLASS I)
- Consider mitral valve surgery in moderate MR who are undergoing CABG (CLASS Ila)
- Consider repair of moderate-to-severe MR in wih CABG who have LVEF <35% (CLASS Ila)
- Consider aortic valve surgery in moderate aortic stenosis who are undergoing CABG (CLASS Ila)
PREOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CABG
RECOMMENDATION |
2011 ACC/AHA |
2012 ACC/AHA |
2014 ACC/AHA |
2014 ESC/EACT |
2012 STS |
Administer aspirin to CABG patients preoperatively |
100-325mg CLASS I |
CLASS I |
81-325mg CLASS I |
75-160mg CLASS I |
|
Discontinue Aspirin 3-5 days preop for patients with increased risk of bleeding or those who refuse blood transfusion |
CLASS I |
CLASS IIa |
|||
For Non-Urgent CABG Stop Clopidogrel > 5 days Stop Ticagrelor > 5 days Stop Prasugrel >7 days To reduce blood transfusion |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
|
In patients referred for urgent CABG, discontinue clopidogrel and ticagrelor for at least 24h to reduce major bleeding complications |
CLASS I |
CLASS I |
|||
In patients referred for urgent CABG, discontinue eptifibatide and tirofiban for at least 2-4h and abciximab for at 12h |
CLASS I |
Stop eptifibatide & tirofiban 4 hours CLASS I |
CLASS I |
||
Anticoagulant therapy: unfractionated heparin; discontinue enozaparin 12-24 h discontinue fondaparinux 24 h discontinue bivalirudin for 3h |
CLASS I |
POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CABG
RECOMMENDATION |
2011 ACC/AHA |
2014 ACC/AHA |
2014 ESC/EACT |
2012 STS |
Administer aspirin to CABG patients indefinitely |
100-325mg CLASS I |
81-325 mg (81 mg with ticagrelor) CLASS I |
75-160mg CLASS I |
CLASS I |
Administer clopidogrel or ticagrelor, in addition to aspirin, for 12 months |
CLASS I |
CLASS IIb |
||
Clopidogrel (75 mg daily) is a reasonable alternative in patients intolerant or allergic to aspirin |
CLASS IIa |
|
CLASS I |
|
In CABG after acute coronary syndromes, restart dual antiplatelet therapy when bleeding risk is diminished. |
|
CLASS I |
||
Once postoperative bleeding risk is decreased, consider testing of response to antiplatelet drugs, either with genetic testing or with point-of-care platelet function testing, to optimise antiplatelet drug effect and minimise thrombotic risk to vein grafts |
|
|
CLASS IIb |